Demotix could soon be blocked in the USA
UPDATE: Today, the 18th January 2012, some of the world's biggest websites, including Wikipedia, have blacked themselves out in protest against the proposed legislation. It looks like the House of Representatives has abandoned SOPA for the moment, but PIPA is still alive in the Senate. We hope US Demotix users will agree with us that this still represents a threat to free speech online.
We don’t often express political views here on the Demotix blog, so you know that when we do it must be important. We’re not on anyone’s side, except for yours - the people who benefit from free speech online.
That value, though, is under threat - and not from the usual suspects.
Internet censorship is usually associated with countries like China, Iran, or Saudi Arabia. But in the last few weeks, efforts in the U.S. Congress to introduce a “Great Firewall of America” using exactly the same technologies as the blocks built by the countries we’ve just mentioned have been stepped up.
Bills have been proposed in the House of Representatives and the Senate to allow DNS blocking of websites that are accused of hosting or facilitating copyright-infringing activities.
If either of these bills becomes law, then sites like Demotix will almost inevitably be blocked to visitors from the USA and have their revenue cut off by US-based payment processors.
Demotix categorically supports the right for every creator - of photojournalism, news, video, art, music, humour, christmas decorations, or anything else - to be acknowledged, credited and to profit from their work. That's what we do!
Any web-wide attempts to ensure creators can do all this better would get our full-throated and enthusiastic support. Unfortunately, this isn't what the proposed American bills would do.
If these bills were to pass, just one of our users uploading a photo containing a copyrighted image, or mistakenly copying a fragment of text from another website, could mean that the entire site would be blocked and for our payment processors, like Paypal, would be forbidden from doing business with us.
The bill in the House of Representatives is called the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). The bill before the Senate is known as the Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property Act (PROTECT-IP).
They both propose that copyright holders should be allowed to complain about websites that they believe infringe their copyright to the U.S. Department of Justice (DoJ).
The DoJ could then apply for a court order, obliging search engines, Domain Name System (DNS) providers, advertisers, payment services providers (like Paypal or Mastercard) and others to sever their relationships with that website.
In practice, this would mean: a website accused of infringement could no longer be reached by US-based users typing its name into the address bar of their web browsers. It would not be able to receive payments. It would not be able to sell advertisement space.
A site that’s unable to interact with people and services in the US is going to be at a gigantic disadvantage. US legislators are proposing to inflict this on the internet in the name of stopping copyright piracy - but what they’ll really be doing is stopping sites like Demotix from growing and flourishing.
The proposals would mean that a site could be punished with no chance to defend itself legally, losing months of advertising, e-commerce and other revenue.
Three prominent law professors wrote in the Stanford Law Review that:
“It would be not just ironic, but tragic, were the United States to join the ranks of these repressive and restrictive regimes, erecting our own “virtual walls” to prevent people from accessing portions of the world’s networks.”
And a whole slew of internet engineers, including “father of the internet” Vint Cerf, wrote in an open letter published by the Electronic Frontier Foundation that:
“The US government has regularly claimed that it supports a free and open Internet, both domestically and abroad. We cannot have a free and open Internet unless its naming and routing systems sit above the political concerns and objectives of any one government or industry.”
This goes to the heart of the SOPA debate: this legislation is being introduced to protect one industry, the entertainment business, which has failed to adapt to the new reality, and which is attempting to hold back change using its deep pockets and armies of lobbyists. It gives no consideration to the possible consequences for much more vital parts of the US and global economy and society.
We like to think that we’re providing you with a valuable service while supporting free speech and democracy.
We’re immensely happy to have built a sustainable business doing something we love and something that helps you to earn money from your sterling, original work. We want to keep doing it, without the threat of collective punishment hanging over us and all of you for the misguided actions of individual users who might upload copyrighted material - or just material that could be claimed to be copyrighted.
If you are a US citizen who uses Demotix, please consider helping us to continue working for you and for free speech, by contacting your Congressional representatives and telling them why you oppose this legislation.
Actually for 9/11 there is a
Actually for 9/11 there is a lot of evidence to support the 19 Arabs (links to OBL are more tenuous for obvious reasons) and I have not come across any other credible theory or evidence. However what you are suggesting is a conspiracy and cover up by the US government not the News Media. Well the US authorities have been caught out in more than one set of lies and coverup (even falsified official documentation) you only have to look back at events in the ME from 1990 onwards so I agree with you that the OBL assassination is open to question (but not 9/11) and you can't trust some of the stuff coming out of the US (or any?) government.
However it does not translate into a media conspiracy as you are suggesting. Many of the events in Iraq where the US had one version the press and media (usually with the exception of Fox) blew it apart and exposed the lies.
The BBC and CNN are about as independent as you can get. More so than Demotix.
Most of the problem is not the reporters on the ground but the news corporations themselves. Also some things just can't be shown at 18:00 on the news. SO the NEws corporations do have control but there are more than enough independent outlets via the internet that most stories get out....... if anyone is interested. Like current UK military operations in Africa. No one is bothered.
The other problem is the internet lets any crackpot put out "news" At least the mainstream agencies and news media do work hard to check their stories and sources.
BTW where was the "venomous rage" in my response?
Good to know someone's awake!
Good to know someone's awake!
Good to know someone's awake!
Good to know someone's awake!
Ahaaaa . . . . I thought
Ahaaaa . . . . I thought that it wouldn't be long before someone hurled that well worn epithet 'Conspiracy Theorist' at me with venomous rage.
In the case of 9/11 most people are not aware that every single one of us, who have an opinion, is a ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ by definition since a conspiracy is a plot by two or more persons to commit a crime and whether we believe the OCT (Official Conspiracy Theory) that it was Bin Laden plus 19 Arabs who dunnit, a theory with not one tiny scrap of evidence in support, or we believe the undeniable surmounting evidence to support theories that it was carried out by two or more other people, we must both dutifully wear the tag - Conspiracy Theorist.
So Chris, welcome to The Club!
oh dear another 9/11
oh dear another 9/11 fantasist.... then compounds it by saying all the world's media are in a conspiracy! There is no such thing. All countries put their slant on the news ie say it like it is from their position. If you watch the BBC, Russia Today and AlJezeera (all available on UK freeview) you will see what I mean. there is no conspiracy. The BBC has gone head to head with governments of all shades in the past. The only media that fit the profile Graham suggests is Fox News and the state run media in places like Iran, China, N. Korea etc. There are far too many people in the news and media business to have any sort of conspiracy Graham is suggesting. Though the Murdoch empire is a concern but they only run a small part of it.
As for OBL it is common knowledge he was originally funded by the CIA. (also several other extreme Islamic groups when the US was trying to get at the USSR in Afghanistan) In fact it has been reported on the BBC/ITV/C4/C5 in various news and documentary programs over the years. As for his death. All the Press can do is report the US military claims. Which Fox news believe and the rest of the world takes a slightly more balanced view on.
Many/Most people in the UK could not care less about a lot of the news as long as they get the sports results and Facebook still works that is the problem.
The main reason that I put my
The main reason that I put my work on a citizen journalist site such as Demotix is because the mainstream media does NOT tell us the truth! Until about 18 months ago I believed what I read saw and listened to from mainstream media sources until I started to research on the internet. One of the shocking statistics that I found was that the mainstream media is owned by a few large corporations under the thumb of the 'global elite' who tell the media exactly what they want us to believe. Now they are running scared because people are wising up to what is really happening. They are wising up to the farce about 9/11 being committed by 19 arabs (6 of whom phoned in on 12th December 2001 to say that they were alive and kicking) and a man called Osama Bin Laden - a CIA stooge for more than 20 years, to say nothing of the medias insult to our intelligence to tell us that he was killed on 1st May 2011. So it comes as no surprise to me that they want to shut up anyone who is breathing even one word of truth and pretty soon the internet will be full of crap just like television with mindless reality (banality) shows and endless soaps to keep us all anaethetised while CNN and BBC will churn out their well perfected lies, deception and misinformation. Of course lies and misinformation can be found on the internet but at least you know that you can find the truth right there alongside it! The thought of fighting this small group of people who want to rule the planet seems like an impossible task, but didn't someoneonce say "For evil to exist all it needs is for good men to do nothing"?
- 1 of 3
- ››

Hi Graham and Chris. I'm not
Hi Graham and Chris. I'm not too keen on conspiracies much, they require brains to get away with one, so I am inclined to agree with the spirit of Chris's arguments. This is not to say that the established media do not sometimes put a spin on events. For example, a story I reported last week, some local media put the number of people attending in their "hundreds of thousands" but no figures Now I did not count everyone, but I wouldn't describe the numbers in those figures; I tried to reflect reality in my report. OTOH, my Tripod report from yesterday, the TV crew were no anonymous citizen journalists by any means! However, I think the situation is even more serious. I wouldn't use the word apathy, but many people are too busy with their lives to be interested in these issues of press freedom and transparency. As Chris says, "..as long as they get the sports results and Facebook still works that is the problem.". There is also the issue that some news does not reached people for various innocent reasons or maybe did not have the impact we imagine it should have. Again, I come across the news that a friend and photojournalists was arrested some two weeks ago just by accident. The story was even reported on Demotix. It was just that the day it happened I was on hols and just did not pick it up. The only conspiracy I can think of is the high prices we have to pay for using our mobile amongst EU countries. Best Lawrence